Skip to content
BFSG Conformity Checker
DEEN
For web designers, agencies and client websites

Check BFSG conformity properly.

*Prepared, not certified. Checked against our own logic – no regulatory approval.

A guided assessment workflow for web designers and agencies: clarify scope, audit website flows click by click, document EN 301 549 / WCAG criteria, review e-commerce and checkout journeys, check Anlage 3 information and receive a clear result: conformant, non-conformant or not determinable.

Opens the signup form. No upfront payment, no hidden costs.

We are looking for 3–5 web designers or agencies for the first manual pilot. Pilot price: 49 €. No upfront payment through the waitlist.

Prepared against WCAG 2.2 AA · EN 301 549 · BFSG Anlage 3

The problem

Scanners find signals. Clients want a decision.

Lighthouse, WAVE and axe can provide technical signals. But they do not answer the client's real question: is the website BFSG conformant in the relevant scope, non-conformant or not reliably determinable? That requires scope clarification, complete user flows, manual interaction checks, standards mapping, Anlage 3 documentation and evidence.

  • 01

    Scanners are not enough

    Automated tools only find part of the problems.

  • 02

    Reports without scope are risky

    Without tested flows and evidence, the conclusion stays weak.

  • 03

    BFSG needs documentation

    Anlage 3 information and e-commerce flows belong in the assessment.

Assessment logic

The planned assessment logic

The BFSG Conformity Checker is not designed to generate a simple issue list. It is designed to guide users through a complete assessment workflow and only allow “conformant” when all relevant required areas have passed and are evidenced.

  1. 01

    Clarify scope

    Check whether BFSG is likely applicable: B2C, e-commerce, booking, payment, login, customer account, service, product, microenterprise and third-party functions.

  2. 02

    Capture website flows

    Capture homepage, navigation, product pages, forms, login, cart, checkout, payment, confirmation, error cases, PDFs and mobile view.

  3. 03

    Audit click by click

    Check links, buttons, inputs, dropdowns, modals, date pickers, cookie banners, payment widgets and checkout buttons individually.

  4. 04

    Document WCAG / EN 301 549

    Document perceivability, operability, understandability and robustness with evidence.

  5. 05

    Check Anlage 3

    Review service description, service execution, accessibility requirement fulfilment and market surveillance authority information.

  6. 06

    Generate result

    Conformant, non-conformant, not determinable, expert review required or legal review required.

Result logic

No vague score. Clear status logic.

The system should not output a vague percentage score. It should only say “BFSG conformant in tested scope” when all relevant assessment steps are complete, passed and evidenced.

  • BFSG conformant in tested scope

    All relevant areas passed and are documented.

  • Non-conformant

    At least one critical required area fails.

  • Not determinable

    Scope, third parties, evidence or manual review are incomplete.

  • Expert review required

    Technical or specialist evaluation requires qualified review.

  • Legal review required

    Legal applicability, formal duties or client scope are unclear.

Founding Pilot

Founding Pilot: 49 € for the first 3–5 testers.

We are not building the finished SaaS first. We are testing the assessment workflow manually with real web designers and agencies. You get the first structured workflow, direct support and influence on the product roadmap.

Pilot price

49 €

one-time · no upfront payment through the waitlist

Not a finished SaaS yet. A real pilot with honest expectations: we test whether the workflow works in real client projects.

Included in the pilot

  • BFSG Scope Wizard
  • website and flow inventory
  • click-by-click assessment matrix
  • WCAG / EN 301 549 structure
  • e-commerce and checkout check
  • Anlage 3 information check
  • findings and evidence template
  • client report structure
  • personal review / feedback loop
  • later discount on the Pro version

Why this page?

This website was prepared against our own checklist.

This landing page should demonstrate that we take the topic seriously. It was not only designed visually, but prepared against the key criteria of our own BFSG checklist.

Prepared assessment status of this landing page

Prepared against internal assessment logic
  • Scope: product and waitlist page only, no checkout on this page
  • Keyboard access: navigation, language switcher, CTAs and form reachable by keyboard
  • Focus: visible focus states for interactive elements
  • Contrast: strong contrast, no white text on light backgrounds
  • Font sizes: minimum 16 px body text, readable on mobile
  • Semantics: header, nav, main, section and footer instead of pure div structure
  • Links and buttons: links for navigation, buttons for actions
  • Forms: visible labels, accessible error and success messages
  • Skip link: “Skip to content”
  • No marquee text or uncontrolled animations
  • Language: DE/EN switcher with understandable labels
  • Anlage 3 logic: information duties are explicitly included as a product module

Note: This section is not regulatory certification or legal opinion. It transparently shows which accessibility and BFSG-relevant requirements were consciously considered for this landing page.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions.